What is geo opportunity?

Geo opportunity puts each country's contribution to your profit next to its share of your ad investment. The signal is the mismatch: a market delivering a large slice of the margin on a small slice of the spend is under-invested, whatever its margin rate happens to be. It is a comparison, not a score — the table shows both sides and lets the gap speak.

Formula

margin share (country) = country margin ÷ total org margin
spend share (country)  = country ad spend ÷ total geo ad spend
                         (paid-session share as proxy when geo spend is absent)

Worked example

France carries 22% of total contribution margin but receives 8% of geo-attributable ad spend; Germany carries 30% on 55% of spend. Neither number alone says much — France's margin rate might even be lower than Germany's. The pairing does: the next experimental budget increment probably earns more in France, where demand demonstrably exists and investment demonstrably doesn't.

How Saldo Metrics computes it

v_geo_opportunity builds one row per country. The demand side groups orders (excluding cancelled and refunded) by the customer's country: order count, net revenue after discounts, and contribution margin under the order-grain rule — an order with any uncosted line is excluded from both the margin sum and the margin-percent denominator, and the revenue it carried is reported separately as uncosted, with a cost_coverage_pct per country saying how complete the margin picture is. The investment side is measured two ways, kept side by side: real spend_share from geo-attributed ad spend where the platforms provide it, and paid_session_share — the country's share of pixel sessions arriving with a paid UTM medium — as the fallback proxy. The org's average margin percent sits in the same row for context.

Why it matters

Ad platforms allocate budget where their auctions find cheap conversions, which is not necessarily where your margin lives. Countries differ in product mix, shipping cost and discount culture, so revenue-based geo reports mislead; this one is built on contribution margin. It is also the input behind the geographic-opportunity recommendations the engine generates.

Common mistakes

• Reading margin share without cost coverage. A country whose orders are mostly uncosted shows an artificially small margin share; check cost_coverage_pct before ranking it.
• Treating the paid-session proxy as spend. Session share weights channels by click volume, not euros; where real geo spend exists, prefer it.
• Scaling into a small market on shares alone. A country with 3 orders can show a striking margin share; the order count column is there to keep the base rate honest.

Where you see this in the app

The Geo Opportunity dashboard widget, and geographic-opportunity entries in the recommendations feed.